SPY Archives | Opportunity Identified

October 2, 2017 | Posted by David Zarling, Head of Investment Research

Invaluable Market Signal From The Value Line Geometric Index

As market participants, we should be taking a scientific approach when putting money to work, always assuming our positions are wrong and need to prove themselves. As part of that process, one piece of evidence we want to look at on a consistent basis is the health of the overall market. One such way to gauge market health is studying market breadth. In other words, how many stocks are actually participating in any directional move. That’s why we’re writing today about an index you might not be aware of but should be familiar with if you follow our research. This index is great at providing insight into the current condition of the U.S. stock market: the Value Line Geometric Index (XVG). This index tracks the median move of stocks within the index using the assumption that each stock has an equal amount (for example, $1,000) invested in them. The daily average move of this index is calculated geometrically (rather than arithmetically). If you want to geek out on the details, you can read more about this calculation here, page 4. In basic terms, the Value Line Geometric Index eliminates an illusion created by cap-weighted index components. Heavily weighted stocks within a cap-weighted index can pull it higher even as the majority of the stocks within the index are not following along. For example, in a cap-weighted index like the S&P 500, it’s possible for the top 100 weighted stocks to carry the index higher while the remaining 400 stocks lose value. As an investor, it might be helpful to identify when this is happening.

The last time we wrote about this Index, we noted it needed to hold and advance beyond the $500 level. Here’s the chart of the Value Line Geometric and S&P 500 Indexes from that post.

Here’s an updated chart comparing the popular cap-weighted S&P 500 Index with the lesser-known Value Line Geometric Index:

The last few weeks have been confirming evidence for our bullish market thesis. XVG held the important $500 level and advanced swiftly to all-time-highs. You read that right. This is the highest Value Line Geometric Index has been. Ever. In fact, this move is confirming a breakout of a 19-year consolidation. Note that price broke above the 1998 highs just this past December. That’s almost 20 years of going nowhere! And last week’s move was a breakout of the more recent 10-month consolidation. Check it out:

From large bases come high spaces. This move is significant and is signaling broad market participation, which is not a bearish characteristic. The last time we covered this important index was back in May. Back then, large market cap stocks were leading the S&P 500 market higher. We wrote:

…we’ll want to watch for clues from the leading sector, Technology, on whether this current run can continue. It’s a positive when economic bellwethers like Apple (AAPL), Amazon (AMZN), Facebook (FB), Google (GOOGL), Nvidia (NVDA), Adobe (ADBE), Microsoft (MSFT), and Netflix (NFLX) can lead. At the same time, it would be healthy if more sectors start to participate. If and when laggards like Energy and Financials find demand, it could signal another strong leg higher for the overall market.

What have Energy and Financials done recently? We thought you’d never ask.

In conclusion, we have evidence right in front of our eyes showing broad market participation and lagging sectors getting bid. This is healthy and normal bull market behavior. We’re not saying that Energy and Financials continue to march straight upward. Trees don’t grow to the moon. But it is significant that lagging sectors are participating and the Value Line Geometric Index is breaking out. This evidence could be signaling another strong leg higher for the overall market.

As always, you can get real-time updates and commentary about this development and many more opportunities here: @360Research

AND, you’ve got FREE access to a great tool we’ve created, The Ultimate ETF Cheat Sheet. Click this link to get your FREE easy-to-use resource guide for all your ETF needs.

Disclaimer: Nothing in this article should be construed as investment advice or a solicitation to buy or sell a security. You invest based on your own decisions. Everything in this post is meant for educational and entertainment purposes only. I or my affiliates may hold positions in securities mentioned in this blog. Please see our Disclosure page for full disclaimer.

September 28, 2017 | Posted by David Zarling, Head of Investment Research

This Is How To Navigate Amazon

Much like its namesake, Amazon stock (ticker: AMZN) is difficult, yet rewarding, to navigate. Over the past two decades, this well-known retail (not technology) company has risen over 48,455%. That’s not a typo. $1,000 invested in AMZN back in 1997 would be worth $484,558 today. That same $1000 invested in the S&P 500 would be worth $1,999 today. Making money in the stock market is easy, right? Wrong. As much as we’d like to think we’re rational individuals, we’re our own worst enemy. When involved with markets, we tend to respond to gains and losses emotionally. Loss aversion is a real and present danger to many portfolios. Here’s a visual of this common emotional experience.

Many market participants experience twice as much pain during drawdowns than the joy experienced during equivalent gains. So what would it have been like to hold on to Amazon since 1997? How bad would the pain have been? Take a look:

Amazon Drawdowns [original chart source]

The upper pane (green) is the price appreciation of AMZN stock. Using hindsight bias, many think the tremendous gains in Amazon were a slam dunk and easy to come by. That couldn’t be further from the truth. The lower pane (red) are the drawdowns experienced by holders of AMZN stock. Talk about agony. For more than a third of its life as a public company, Amazon has been in a 50+% drawdown. For the buy-and-hold investor, it’s hard to imagine the discipline needed to hold on during 70-90% losses. It’s likely many capitulated under the duress. The good news is, we don’t have to be buy-and-hope investors. In fact, we might even call drawdowns a downtrend! Remember, our number one job as market participants is to manage risk and protect capital. Using supply and demand dynamics (aka price movement) to do so, there is zero reason to experience such massive drawdowns. Let’s take a look at the buying and selling going on with AMZN.

Here’s the weekly chart:

For a while now, AMZN has been making a series of higher highs and higher lows. This is normal behavior for uptrending stocks. This doesn’t mean Amazon doesn’t experience sideways consolidation from time-to-time. All of 2014 was an intermediate downtrend / consolidation prior to resuming its uptrend ways. Even then, we would’ve been able to recognize a price momentum change using a trendline dating back to 2012. And more recently, we saw AMZN break a price momentum trendline (green) back in August. This took place both on an absolute and relative (to SPY) basis. This was a clue to let someone else have AMZN. It doesn’t necessarily mean impending doom. A broken price momentum trendline just means the demand/supply dynamic has shifted. Back then, we tweeted (click here to follow real-time supply/demand analysis) AMZN would likely form a Head & Shoulders pattern:

Many people use patterns to confirm their biases rather than create if/then binary decision-making scenarios. For example, the Head & Shoulders pattern itself has gotten a bad reputation as a “Topping Pattern.” In reality, Head & Shoulder’s patterns are a compression in price as the disparity between buying urgency and selling urgency narrows. So here we are at the end of September talking about the Head & Shoulders pattern in AMZN. See the daily chart below:

Amazon has gone nowhere for five months. The battle between supply and demand has created a well-defined Head & Shoulders pattern. Is this a top? We have no idea. No one does. Don’t let anyone tell you otherwise. It could simply be a five-month consolidation. Afterall, consolidations tend to resolve in the direction of the primary trend. This could be a top. It could also be consolidation before heading higher. Our job is not be right or wrong. Our job is to be on the right side of the trade. Let’s a look a little closer to identify some important support levels.

Up close, we can see buyers have shown up before near the 935 price level. If they don’t show up at this level upon any retest of that price point, we have the evidence we need to make a decision and let someone else have AMZN. From an upside target perspective, Amazon will need to first clear the downtrend line (in green) and then sustain above the left shoulder highs near 1,011. If it can close above, and hold, those levels, it’s like a new series of higher highs and higher lows are upon us. Another possibility is price continues to be range bound between 935 and 1,000 through the end of the year (this would bring time symmetry to the right shoulder, matching the time duration of the left shoulder). Trade accordingly.

In conclusion, the game plan is simple. If Amazon closes below 935, we want nothing to do with it. Above that level, it makes sense to own one of the top three appreciating stocks of the past decade. Get yourself on the right side of the trade. We don’t need to experience capital crushing drawdowns. Trade at your own risk.

As always, you can get real-time updates and commentary about this development and many more opportunities here: @360Research

AND, you’ve got FREE access to a great tool we’ve created, The Ultimate ETF Cheat Sheet. Click this link to get your FREE easy-to-use resource guide for all your ETF needs.

August 1, 2017 | Posted by David Zarling, Head of Investment Research

This Stock Market Rotation Has Some Energy Behind It

It’s always good to take some time off, step back, and refresh. During our short leave, we received inquiries on when our next blog post would be released. Your feedback and demand for our work are appreciated. The idea that we’re providing valuable information is motivating. Our break is over and we’re back with some more market insights you might find useful. Today’s update involves a major industrial sector that has been underperforming for a long time: Energy. For over 9 years, the Energy sector has underperformed the broad market. Don’t believe us? Take a look.

Above is a weekly chart of Energy (using ETF, XLE) versus the S&P 500 (using ETF, SPY). Simply put, when the ratio rises, XLE is outperforming. When the ratio falls, SPY is outperforming. Since mid-2008, Energy has been nothing but a hot mess. From June 2008 through today, if you were involved in Energy, you lost 7% of your capital while the broad market represented by the S&P 500 appreciated 114%. Talk about opportunity cost.

Within this 9-year period, however, there have been countertrend moves worth participating in. For example, Energy outperformed the S&P 500 +29% versus +12% in calendar year 2016. Not too shabby. But as the chart above highlights, the bigger trend is down. So what we’re shedding light on here today is NOT an opportunity with the winds of a larger trend at its back. What is notable, however, is the recent breakout of Energy on an absolute and relative basis.

We can clearly see buyers have changed the trajectory of price with XLE breaking out on an absolute basis and on a relative basis versus the S&P 500. This development is in conjunction with a divergence between price and momentum and buyers stepping in a logical support level near $63. In addition, price has recorded and higher low and higher high on this time frame. That’s the very definition of a trend change. As long as XLE can hold and sustain above $66.17, this countertrend move in energy will have legs. With an upside target near $70, this set-up has a friendly reward-to-risk ratio of almost 8-to-1.

To conclude, while we’re not in the business of picking a bottom in Energy, it’s quite possible this recent move is something worth participating in. The game plan is simple. Above $66, own XLE. Below that, it can be someone else’s problem. Trade at your own risk.

As always, you can get real-time updates and commentary about this development and many more opportunities here: @360Research

By the way, we created this free tool for you, The Ultimate ETF Cheat Sheet. It’s an easy-to-use ETF resource guide. We think you’ll like it.

July 3, 2017 | Posted by David Zarling, Head of Investment Research

Check Out The 4th of July Fireworks For This Fashionable Stock

We hope this post finds our Canadian and American readers enjoying their Independence Day weekend. It’s important to step back and remember the freedoms we often take for granted. Not everyone is so fortunate. May we always cherish the sacrifices made (and be willing to do the same) to ensure a free society. Because of the holiday, this update will be as brief as possible. We’ve found a fashionable stock on the verge of a firework-like breakout: VFCorp (ticker: VFC). Let’s get down to business.

For many years, VFCorp (the parent company of Lee, The North Face, Jansport, Vans, you get the point) was a leader of markets. More specifically, from late 2008 thru mid-2015, VFC outpaced the S&P 500 (including dividends) 4-to-1*. Over those 7 years, VFC gained 230% while the S&P 500 gained only 50%. Since July 2015, however, VFCorp stock price has been recording lower highs and lower lows, the very essence of a downtrend. But last week confirmed the possibility this downtrend is over and outperformance is back in a big way for this stock.

Here’s the weekly chart of VFC:

It’s easy to see the drawdown from July 2015 through the February 2017 bottom, which filled the price gap from October 2013. The February 2017 low was also the 38.2% Fibonacci retracement of the entire move from the November 2008 low to July 2015 high. Price discovery is not random guys. We see price work like this over and over again across any liquid investment vehicle with a tremendous amount of memory from the past.

We can also clearly the see the breakout on an absolute and relative (to the S&P 500) basis. Not only that, but this momentum breakout is coinciding with a breakout from a horizontally configured inverse head and shoulders pattern. This is a bullish set-up with a confluence of characteristics supporting higher prices for VFC. Specifically, this set-up is targeting $66, +14.5% from here. Let’s get a little more tactical with a daily chart of VFC:

Whenever we enter a trade, priority number one is risk management. We need to know when we’re on the wrong side of the trade. For us, it makes sense to own VFC above $55.75. Below that, and we’ll let the market have it. This particular set-up has a reward to risk ratio of almost 5 to 1. The reward is asymmetrically skewed in our favor. We like that.

To conclude, the weight-of-evidence suggests higher prices for VFC. The simple yet prudent game plan is to own this fashionable stock above $55.75. Trade at your own risk.

*For those who are wondering what the respective returns were from the March 2009 low of the S&P 500, they were 592% (VFC) and 225% (S&P 500)

As always, you can get real-time updates and commentary about this development and many more opportunities here: @360Research

By the way, we created this free tool for you, The Ultimate ETF Cheat Sheet. It’s an easy-to-use ETF resource guide. We think you’ll like it.

February 1, 2016 | Posted by David Zarling, Head of Investment Research

Make Sure To Look At The Big Picture

At 360 Investment Research, we study price to understand the interaction of supply and demand in the marketplace. When there is more demand than supply, price goes up. When there is more supply than demand, price goes down. This is a simple, but often overlooked, concept that all investors should pay attention to on a regular basis. Studying price is paramount because it gives us an edge in the market and is the only coincident, or even leading, indicator available. Nothing is more current than price.

In market environments such as the current one, it can be a valuable exercise to step back and review price from a big picture perspective. Rather than being shortsighted and look at the past few weeks, we can gather tremendous insight from looking at price over the past 30 years (or more).

Below is a monthly chart of the S&P 500 dating back to 1987. Overlaying the monthly price candlesticks are some proprietary moving averages that do a great job indicating when to be long or short U.S. equities. Check it out:

By function, moving averages lag price. Even though these averages lag price, they are still more actionable than any economic indicator the BEA, BLS, or Federal Reserve can provide (if you’re from any of those agencies and reading this, please don’t take offense). And upon reviewing the most recent crossover, we can see that the S&P 500 is not buyable or ownable right now.

We can look at the same chart, but from a different perspective, by removing the moving averages and studying previous areas of supply and demand. Going through this exercise, we can see that sellers appeared in a big way around the 2100 level on the S&P 500. Likewise, during the recent price correction, buyers stepped in near the low 1800s. Take a look.

Upon inspection, we can see that we’re in “no man’s land” – an area between 1812 and 2134 where buyers and sellers will determine the markets next big move. In order for the market to regain solid ground and not deepen the current correction, demand needs to keep price from breaking the 1800 level and eventually drive price on to new highs. From a historical perspective, a major trendline (in green) dating back to 1987 carries significance. If that trendline is broken, more sellers will step in. And if not enough buyers are available in the 1812-2134 window, selling will intensify and price will seek demand (aka price discovery) through further price declines until demand is reintroduced. The next most likely area of demand is near 1550-1600, which is an area of price polarity where previous supply (the tops in 2000 and 2007) became an area of demand.

We’re not predicting further price declines, but the study of price indicates that there are more sellers than buyers from this vantage point. Until that changes, and buyers step in to take the S&P 500 to new highs, we’re not interested in owning this market.

Until next time, trade safe.

Disclaimer: Nothing in this article should be construed as investment advice or a solicitation to buy or sell a security. You invest based on your own decisions