Opportunity Identified

for the curious investor

  • Home
  • About
    • Founder’s Story
    • This Blog
    • 360 Investment Research
    • The 360 Process
    • Client First Tax and Wealth Advisors
  • Insiders Only
  • Contact Us

September 28, 2017 | Posted by David Zarling, Head of Investment Research

This Is How To Navigate Amazon

0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0

Much like its namesake, Amazon stock (ticker: AMZN) is difficult, yet rewarding, to navigate. Over the past two decades, this well-known retail (not technology) company has risen over 48,455%. That’s not a typo. $1,000 invested in AMZN back in 1997 would be worth $484,558 today. That same $1000 invested in the S&P 500 would be worth $1,999 today. Making money in the stock market is easy, right? Wrong. As much as we’d like to think we’re rational individuals, we’re our own worst enemy. When involved with markets, we tend to respond to gains and losses emotionally. Loss aversion is a real and present danger to many portfolios. Here’s a visual of this common emotional experience.

Prospect Theory Loss Aversion

Many market participants experience twice as much pain during drawdowns than the joy experienced during equivalent gains. So what would it have been like to hold on to Amazon since 1997? How bad would the pain have been? Take a look:

Amazon Drawdowns[original chart source]

The upper pane (green) is the price appreciation of AMZN stock. Using hindsight bias, many think the tremendous gains in Amazon were a slam dunk and easy to come by. That couldn’t be further from the truth. The lower pane (red) are the drawdowns experienced by holders of AMZN stock. Talk about agony. For more than a third of its life as a public company, Amazon has been in a 50+% drawdown. For the buy-and-hold investor, it’s hard to imagine the discipline needed to hold on during 70-90% losses. It’s likely many capitulated under the duress. The good news is, we don’t have to be buy-and-hope investors. In fact, we might even call drawdowns a downtrend! Remember, our number one job as market participants is to manage risk and protect capital. Using supply and demand dynamics (aka price movement) to do so, there is zero reason to experience such massive drawdowns. Let’s take a look at the buying and selling going on with AMZN.

Here’s the weekly chart:

Amazon Weekly Chart

For a while now, AMZN has been making a series of higher highs and higher lows. This is normal behavior for uptrending stocks. This doesn’t mean Amazon doesn’t experience sideways consolidation from time-to-time. All of 2014 was an intermediate downtrend / consolidation prior to resuming its uptrend ways. Even then, we would’ve been able to recognize a price momentum change using a trendline dating back to 2012. And more recently, we saw AMZN break a price momentum trendline (green) back in August. This took place both on an absolute and relative (to SPY) basis. This was a clue to let someone else have AMZN. It doesn’t necessarily mean impending doom. A broken price momentum trendline just means the demand/supply dynamic has shifted. Back then, we tweeted (click here to follow real-time supply/demand analysis) AMZN would likely form a Head & Shoulders pattern:

AMZN Tweet from August

Many people use patterns to confirm their biases rather than create if/then binary decision-making scenarios. For example, the Head & Shoulders pattern itself has gotten a bad reputation as a “Topping Pattern.” In reality, Head & Shoulder’s patterns are a compression in price as the disparity between buying urgency and selling urgency narrows. So here we are at the end of September talking about the Head & Shoulders pattern in AMZN. See the daily chart below:

AMZN Head and Shoulders Pattern Daily Chart

Amazon has gone nowhere for five months. The battle between supply and demand has created a well-defined Head & Shoulders pattern. Is this a top? We have no idea. No one does. Don’t let anyone tell you otherwise. It could simply be a five-month consolidation. Afterall, consolidations tend to resolve in the direction of the primary trend. This could be a top. It could also be consolidation before heading higher. Our job is not be right or wrong. Our job is to be on the right side of the trade. Let’s a look a little closer to identify some important support levels.

AMZN Daily Chart Risk Management

Up close, we can see buyers have shown up before near the 935 price level. If they don’t show up at this level upon any retest of that price point, we have the evidence we need to make a decision and let someone else have AMZN. From an upside target perspective, Amazon will need to first clear the downtrend line (in green) and then sustain above the left shoulder highs near 1,011. If it can close above, and hold, those levels, it’s like a new series of higher highs and higher lows are upon us. Another possibility is price continues to be range bound between 935 and 1,000 through the end of the year (this would bring time symmetry to the right shoulder, matching the time duration of the left shoulder). Trade accordingly.

In conclusion, the game plan is simple. If Amazon closes below 935, we want nothing to do with it. Above that level, it makes sense to own one of the top three appreciating stocks of the past decade. Get yourself on the right side of the trade. We don’t need to experience capital crushing drawdowns. Trade at your own risk.

As always, you can get real-time updates and commentary about this development and many more opportunities here: @360Research

AND, you’ve got FREE access to a great tool we’ve created, The Ultimate ETF Cheat Sheet. Click this link to get your FREE easy-to-use resource guide for all your ETF needs.


Disclaimer: Nothing in this article should be construed as investment advice or a solicitation to buy or sell a security. You invest based on your own decisions. Everything in this post is meant for educational and entertainment purposes only. I or my affiliates may hold positions in securities mentioned in this blog. Please see our Disclosure page for full disclaimer.

Filed Under: Consumer Discretionary, Consumer Staples, Equity, Other, Pattern Recognition, Ratio Analysis, Relative Strength Analysis, Risk Management, Sector, Supply and Demand, Techniques & Tactics, Trend Analysis Tagged With: $AMZN, $SPX, $SPY, $XRT, Amazon, Amazon.com, Retail, SPY

March 6, 2017 | Posted by David Zarling, Head of Investment Research

Sector Rotation Provides Clues About Current Market Environment

0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0

The move in U.S. stocks over the past few months has been impressive. The rapid move has talking heads on TV proclaiming, “we’re overbought” and chances are, you or your neighbor think “this won’t end well.” Unfortunately, “overbought” is an ambiguous, bias-confirming adjective and “this won’t end well” is not an investment plan. Frankly, markets can stay “overbought” for a very long time (see 1995-2000). And those who lament, “this won’t end well”, will eventually be right; five weeks from now or five years from now. Neither of the aforementioned adds any value to the decision-making required to participate and profit in markets. If we’re going to make money in the markets, we need to understand how they operate and have an if/then plan ready to go. One of the more important aspects of understanding a market is looking underneath the surface and identify the undercurrents impacting supply and demand. An important exercise we can implement is studying sector rotation, which takes place as money moves from one industry sector to another. This process can give us clues and insights into the current market environment. Let’s put the work in.

At 360 Investment Research, we like to take advantage of Relative Rotation Graphs (RRG) Charts™ [1]. These charts show you an investable asset’s relative strength and momentum relative to a collection of other securities. Developed by Julius de Kempenaer of RRG Research, RRGs help us identify where we should be invested, or be looking to invest, within a universe of investments. Decisions should not be based solely on RRG analysis, but these charts definitely help us focus on those areas of the investment universe that deserve it. They give us the big picture within one picture. We appreciate their usefulness in observing sector rotation and you should too.

Using RRG™ analysis, we’re going to look at the relative strength of the U.S. Market’s largest sectors, using the S&P 500 as our benchmark. Basically, we want to see where in the U.S. Market money is moving and where we should be focusing our attention. We want to observe sector rotation from a momentum point of view. Accordingly, we’re going to use the following ETFs representing the 9 largest U.S. sectors and compare them against the S&P 500:

  • XLP (Consumer Staples)
  • XLY (Consumer Discretionary)
  • XLE (Energy)
  • XLF (Financials)
  • XLV (Health Care)
  • XLI (Industrials)
  • XLB (Materials)
  • XLK (Technology)
  • XLU (Utilities)

In the RRG™ below, the long tails represent the movement of each sector’s ETF over the past 7 weeks in comparison to the S&P 500 ETF, SPY. What do we see? The first thing to notice is the chart of SPY in the upper right corner. U.S. stocks have been moving upward in a positive trend. A series of higher highs and higher lows is about a simple as it gets in identifying an upward trend. Accordingly, when we analyze this chart, we want to be cognizant of the fact U.S. stocks as a whole have been a pretty good place to be.

RRG Sector Rotation Chart of US Sectors

Over the past 7 weeks, we can see there’s been some decent sector rotation. Right away, we notice three sectors in the blue upper left quadrant improving together. They used to be laggards during the strong push upward in the S&P 500. Over the past month and a half, these laggards have shown quality improvement. The three sectors are Consumer Staples (XLP), Health Care (XLV), and Utilities (XLU). Is there anything these sectors have in common? I thought you would never ask. These three sectors are considered defensive (or low beta) sectors. Money managers will move money into these sectors if they are undervalued or to protect assets during a decline in the market. After all, people get sick, need toilet paper, and buy electricity regardless of economic conditions (for the most part). So this improvement could simply be a healthy rotation, providing further fuel to the upside, or a warning that a decline in the market may be upon us. Before we go jumping to conclusions, it should be noted that a decline could be anything from -1% to -100%. As humans, we have this weird quirk where we assume the worst. It’s part of our fight or flight survival instinct. There’s nothing wrong with it unless this reaction clouds our vision so badly we make poor investment decisions. In order to get more clarity, let’s look at each of these three sectors individually from a price perspective.

First, Consumer Staples. Here’s the weekly chart:

Consumer Staples Weekly Chart

Demand for Consumer Staples since late 2016 has driven XLP up to an area where sellers have shown up in the past. Interestingly, we notice XLP broke above a similar area of supply (the lower shaded area), which turned into support. That breakout took place in February 2016. You guessed it, while the S&P 500 was bottoming after the worst start to a year on record, Consumer Staples was breaking out. If XLP can break above the current level of supply near $55, it might not necessarily be a bad thing. This sector could be signaling the next leg up and be a leader in the overall market.

Next up, Utilities. No electricity = no wi-fi = armageddon.

Utilities Weekly Chart

Similar to Consumer Staples, Utilities were breaking above prior resistance (middle shaded area) in February 2016. Further back, we can see Utilities were a relatively safe place to be during the market upheaval taking place in late 2015. In fact, from late 2015 through early 2016, the Utility sector outperformed the other 8 major sectors. And just like Consumer Staples, XLU is at a very important level. The $51 handle marks an area where sellers have shown up in the past.

Finally, Health Care’s weekly chart:

Health Care Weekly Chart

This one is both the same, yet different, from the aforementioned sectors. Hwut? I know. Mind blowing.

First, let’s stick with the similarities. Health Care (XLV) bottomed via a false breakdown (price moved below previous demand and quickly reversed up) in February 2016 along with the rest of the market. That’s where the similarity ends. Looking further left on the chart, it’s apparent demand for this important sector was high for several years in the past. In fact, XLV outperformed the S&P 500 each year from 2011-2015. That’s five years of market leadership. If this important sector could retake its leadership title, it would be a tailwind for the broad market. And just last week, it showed signs of doing just that as buyers drove price through an area where sellers had shown up urgently twice before. This breakout is significant. The longer Health Care can stay above $74, the more likely this sector will recapture its market leadership title. Keep an eye on this one.

In conclusion, the last few weeks have seen defensive sectors improve dramatically. This sector rotation could be a harbinger of an incoming broad market decline or a sign of healthy undercurrents for this raging bull market. We don’t need to predict what’s next. We’ll watch price instead. Price keeps us on the right side of the trade and knows more than we do.

As always, you can see our daily market thoughts on Twitter @360Research

AND, you’ve got FREE access to an investing tool we’ve created, The Ultimate ETF Cheat Sheet. It’s an easy-to-use resource guide.

[1]  Note: The terms “Relative Rotation Graph” and “RRG” are registered trademarks of RRG Research.


Disclaimer: Nothing in this article should be construed as investment advice or a solicitation to buy or sell a security. You invest based on your own decisions.

Filed Under: Consumer Staples, Education, Equity, ETF, Health Care, Market Environment & Structure, Other, Relative Strength Analysis, Rotational Regression Graphs, Sector, Sector Rotation, Supply and Demand, Utilities Tagged With: $SPX, $SPY, $XLP, $XLU, $XLV, S&P 500

November 20, 2014 | Posted by David Zarling, Head of Investment Research

Leader of the Pack [Weight of Evidence, Part 5 of 7]

0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0

Weight of Evidence: Part 1 | Part 2 | Part 3 | Part 4 | Part 5 | Part 6 | Part 7

At 360 Investment Research, we like to dig deep into the market and take a look at what sectors are leading the US market upward. By analyzing sectors on a relative basis against the S&P 500, we can gain insight into what sectors are leading the charge. This, in turn, may provide clues on where we are in the market/economic cycle. The theoretical market/economic cycle is a model based on the work of Sam Stovall in his book, S&P’s Guide to Sector Rotation. The basic premise is that different sectors are stronger at different points in the economic cycle. StockCharts.com has done a great job elaborating on this rotational cycle. The chart below is courtesy of StockCharts.com. It does a good job of visualizing these relationships and the order in which each sector should outperform in the context of the overall market. Moving from left to right, we see that Cyclicals (or Consumer Discretionary) and Technology lead the market out of bottoms. Industrials, Basic Materials, and Energy lead during a Bull Market. And Staples, Healthcare, Utilities, and Finance are the safe havens during Bear Markets. It’s not as clear cut as what I just wrote or what is visualized below, but it is a really great guide to the likely relative performance characteristics of each sector as the market progresses.

Sector Rotation Model - Stockcharts

Researching approximately how each sector is performing can be a good exercise in determining where we might be in the overall market cycle. Obviously, if we’re in a healthy Bull Market, we want to see Bull Market leaders like Technology, Industrials, Materials and Energy outperforming (or leading) the overall market. Conversely, we would be concerned about the overall prospects of the market and economy if we see that big money is moving into defensive sectors like Staples, Healthcare, and Utilities. So let’s dig in and see what sectors are leading the overall market.

One of the best ways of observing which sectors are doing the best and which sectors are lagging is through the use of Relative Rotation Graphs (RRG) [1]. RRG charts show us the relative strength and momentum for a group of stocks or ETFs. These stocks or ETFs are compared against a benchmark. In our case, we’re going to compare the aforementioned sectors using the overall market (the S&P 500) as our benchmark. That is to say, the performance of each of these sectors will be compared against the performance of the S&P 500. If a sector is outperforming the market, they are said to be the leaders. If a sector is underperforming the market, they are the laggards. On the RRG chart below, the following ETFs are being used as proxies for each sector:

  • XLY (Cyclicals or Consumer Discretionary)
  • XLK (Technology)
  • XLI (Industrials)
  • XLB (Materials)
  • XLE (Energy)
  • XLP (Staples)
  • XLV (Health Care)
  • XLU (Utilities)
  • XLF (Financials)

Of the ETFs above, those with strong relative strength and momentum in comparison to the S&P 500 appear in the green Leading quadrant. Those with relative momentum fading move into the yellow Weakening quadrant. If relative strength then fades, they move into the red Lagging quadrant. And when momentum starts to pick up again, they shift into the blue Improving quadrant. In the RRG below, the long tails represent the movement of each sector over the past 20 weeks in comparison to the S&P 500. So what do we see? We see that  XLV, XLU, XLP, and XLF have moved from positions of weakness and laggards to positions of leadership. Health Care (XLV), Utilities (XLU), Staples (XLP), and Financials (XLF) – defensive sectors – are leading this market. On the other hand, Technology (XLK) is weakening while Energy (XLE), Materials (XLB), and Cyclicals (XLY) are lagging. Bluntly, defensive stocks are leading and those who we want to lead a Bull Market are lagging. Money is flowing into defensive sectors. This is not what a healthy and powerful Bull Market looks like. Does it mean that this the top of the Bull Market? No one knows that. But, enough money is flowing into defensive sectors that investors like you and me should take notice.

[1]  Note: The terms “Relative Rotation Graph” and “RRG” are registered trademarks of RRG Research.

11-21-2014 Leader of the Pack RRG [weight of evidence, 5 of 7]

Weight of Evidence: Part 1 | Part 2 | Part 3 | Part 4 | Part 5 | Part 6 | Part 7

Filed Under: Consumer Discretionary, Consumer Staples, Energy, Equity, ETF, Financials, Health Care, Industrials, Materials, Relative Strength Analysis, Rotational Regression Graphs, Sector, Sector Rotation, Techniques & Tactics, Technology, Utilities Tagged With: $SPX, $XLB, $XLE, $XLF, $XLI, $XLK, $XLP, $XLU, $XLV, $XLY, Consumer Discretionary, Defensive stocks, Economic Cycle, Energy, Financials, Health Care, Industrials, Laggards, Leaders, Market Cycle, Materials, Relative Rotation Graph, RRG, RRG Research, S&P 500, S&P's Guide to Sector Rotation, Sam Stovall, Sector Rotation, Sectors, Staples, Stockcharts.com, Technology, Utilities

Find Out Our Top 10 Questions to Ask Your Financial Adivsor!

Subscribe to our mailing list today. No spam - we promise!

* indicates required
Tweets by @@360Research

Recent Posts

  • How To Get Involved In The Drug Trade (It’s Not What You Think!)
  • Invaluable Market Signal From The Value Line Geometric Index
  • This Is How To Navigate Amazon
  • Get Intel Inside Your Portfolio
  • Simple Market Secret: Just Look Left

Tags

$DBO $ES_F $INDU $SH $SPX $SPXA200 $SPY $TNX $USD $USO $UUP $VIX $WTIC $XLP $XLV Ascending Triangle Bonds Bottom breakout Confluence Consolidation Cycles demand descending triagle divergence Dow Jones Energy measured move Price Resistance risk/reward risk management RSX Russia RUT S&P 500 S&P500 SPY Supply TLT Trend Change trendline US Dollar Volatility weight of evidence

Copyright 360 Investment Research, LLC - All rights reserved © 2023